Jonas Adam Mohamed Osman Abdelghafour

IFRS quantitative finance series

IFRS 9 Management Overlays: Quantification Without Double Counting

Overlays can be necessary when models or data do not capture a material reporting-date risk. They become dangerous when used as permanent buffers, unexplained targets or substitutes for fixing known model defects.

By Jonas Adam Mohamed Osman Abdelghafour · Published 1 September 2026 · Independent educational analysis

Start with an identified gap

Each overlay should name the risk, affected population, reason the core model misses it and evidence available at the reporting date. The bank should distinguish emerging risks, data limitations, model limitations and operational corrections because they require different solutions.

Quantify transparently

Methods may include scenario differentials, stressed parameter shifts, benchmark loss rates or exposure-specific adjustments. The calculation should show how the adjustment relates to the identified shortfall and how overlap with scenarios, staging and other overlays was prevented.

Design an exit

An overlay needs expiry criteria from inception. Release may follow model remediation, data capture, disappearance of the risk or incorporation into scenarios. Backtesting should compare the original rationale with subsequent evidence rather than judging only whether the total allowance was conservative.

Quantitative expression

Reported ECL = core model ECL + approved adjustments for demonstrable residual gaps

Implementation controls

Important: This article explains quantitative and reporting architecture. Banks must apply the complete IFRS requirements, relevant jurisdictional rules and entity-specific accounting policies.

Primary references

Related articles