Jonas Adam Mohamed Osman Abdelghafour

IFRS quantitative finance series

IFRS 9 LGD: Collateral, Cure and Discounted Recoveries

LGD turns default into an expected cash shortfall. For secured banking books, the result depends on more than collateral value: timing, enforceability, seniority, costs, cure, re-default and the path of exposure all matter.

By Jonas Adam Mohamed Osman Abdelghafour · Published 1 September 2026 · Independent educational analysis

Model recovery cash flows

A transparent approach projects collections, collateral proceeds, guarantees and costs through time. Haircuts should reflect market and execution risk rather than act as unexplained prudence. Recoveries that are remote or legally uncertain require evidence before inclusion.

Cure is not zero loss

Accounts can return to performing status after default but still generate arrears, concessions, collection costs or later re-default. Cure and liquidation paths should be modelled consistently, with re-default risk included where material.

Discounting changes the answer

Two portfolios with identical nominal recoveries can have different LGD if recovery timing differs. Slow legal processes increase the present value shortfall. Validation should therefore examine both recovery amounts and timing errors.

Quantitative expression

LGD = 1 − present value(expected recoveries net of costs) / exposure at default

Implementation controls

Important: This article explains quantitative and reporting architecture. Banks must apply the complete IFRS requirements, relevant jurisdictional rules and entity-specific accounting policies.

Primary references

Related articles