Jonas Adam Mohamed Osman Abdelghafour

IFRS quantitative finance series

CVA, DVA and Funding Adjustments in IFRS 13 Bank Valuations

Derivative valuation starts with contractual cash flows and market factors, but fair value also reflects non-performance risk. Credit valuation adjustment and debit valuation adjustment address counterparty and own credit effects; funding adjustments require careful analysis of market-participant assumptions and double counting.

By Jonas Adam Mohamed Osman Abdelghafour · Published 1 September 2026 · Independent educational analysis

Expected exposure and default

CVA combines future positive exposure, counterparty default likelihood and loss severity through time. DVA applies the corresponding logic to own non-performance risk on negative exposure. Netting and collateral affect exposure only when consistent with enforceable arrangements and valuation assumptions.

Wrong-way risk

Exposure and default are not always independent. A counterparty may weaken precisely when the derivative becomes valuable to the bank. Specific and general wrong-way risk should be identified, modelled where material and included in uncertainty assessment.

Avoid adjustment overlap

Liquidity, funding, collateral, close-out and credit effects can enter several adjustments or base curves. A valuation framework needs a clear decomposition and reconciliation so the same risk is not charged twice.

Quantitative expression

CVA ≈ Σₜ discounted expected positive exposure(t) × marginal default probability(t) × LGD

Implementation controls

Important: This article explains quantitative and reporting architecture. Banks must apply the complete IFRS requirements, relevant jurisdictional rules and entity-specific accounting policies.

Primary references

Related articles